← Market explorer

Market rankings

49 markets ranked on macroeconomic fundamentals, weighted for industrial. Every score breaks out to its components.

Asset classIndustrialOfficeRetailMultifamilyLandResidential
Market tier

Only 46 of 196 markets have industrial-specific readings. The rest are scored on macro data alone and show it in the Data column.

RankMarketMacroClassYour readScoreDirectionData
1Salt Lake City, UTprimary+0.41+0.64—+0.55Expanding
2Jacksonville, FLprimary−0.12+0.73—+0.39Expanding
3Austin, TXprimary+0.23+0.47—+0.37Expanding
4Seattle, WAprimary+0.09+0.43—+0.29Expanding
5Kansas City, MOprimary+0.08+0.41—+0.28Expanding
6San Antonio, TXprimary−0.01+0.39—+0.23Flat
7San Jose, CAprimary−0.19+0.40—+0.16Flat
8Dallas, TXprimary+0.23+0.07—+0.13Flat
9Nashville, TNprimary+0.12+0.10—+0.11Flat
10Las Vegas, NVprimary+0.02+0.13—+0.08Flat
11Fresno, CAprimary+0.06+0.09—+0.08Flat
12Columbus, OHprimary−0.10+0.20—+0.08Flat
13Raleigh, NCprimary+0.30−0.08—+0.07Flat
14Cincinnati, OHprimary+0.15+0.02—+0.07Flat
15Houston, TXprimary+0.08+0.06—+0.07Flat
16Providence, RIprimary+0.06——+0.06Flat
17Minneapolis, MNprimary−0.20+0.22—+0.05Flat
18Miami, FLprimary+0.15−0.04—+0.04Flat
19Charlotte, NCprimary+0.10−0.02—+0.02Flat
20Boston, MAprimary+0.01——+0.01Flat
21Tampa, FLprimary+0.10−0.06—+0.00Flat
22St. Louis, MOprimary−0.03+0.02—+0.00Flat
23Phoenix, AZprimary−0.16+0.10—−0.00Flat
24Oklahoma City, OKprimary−0.11+0.02—−0.03Flat
25Cleveland, OHprimary−0.04——−0.04Flat
26Memphis, TNprimary−0.33+0.08—−0.09Flat
27Orlando, FLprimary+0.24−0.32—−0.09Flat
28Baltimore, MDprimary+0.11−0.25—−0.10Flat
29Philadelphia, PAprimary+0.16−0.29—−0.11Flat
30Detroit, MIprimary−0.13−0.14—−0.14Flat
31Buffalo, NYprimary−0.12−0.16—−0.15Flat
32Milwaukee, WIprimary−0.05−0.26—−0.18Flat
33Sacramento, CAprimary−0.37−0.07—−0.19Flat
34Atlanta, GAprimary+0.12−0.39—−0.19Flat
35San Diego, CAprimary+0.01−0.35—−0.20Flat
36San Francisco, CAprimary−0.09−0.38—−0.26Contracting
37New York, NYprimary−0.02−0.46—−0.29Contracting
38Riverside, CAprimary−0.13−0.40—−0.29Contracting
39Pittsburgh, PAprimary+0.03−0.52—−0.30Contracting
40Indianapolis, INprimary−0.33−0.28—−0.30Contracting
41Los Angeles, CAprimary−0.23−0.36—−0.31Contracting
42Chicago, ILprimary−0.28−0.33—−0.31Contracting
43Denver, COprimary−0.27−0.41—−0.36Contracting
44Birmingham, ALprimary−0.12−0.52—−0.36Contracting
45Virginia Beach, VAprimary−0.18−0.49—−0.36Contracting
46Washington, DCprimary−0.40−0.43—−0.42Contracting
47Louisville/Jefferson County, KYprimary−0.22−0.57—−0.43Contracting
48Richmond, VAprimary−0.30−0.56—−0.46Contracting
49Portland, ORprimary−0.38−0.83—−0.65Contracting
Expanding score at or above +0.25Flat betweenContracting at or below −0.25Data = share of this class’s inputs actually present

Weights for industrial: 30% macro, 45% class-specific, 25% your read. Data as of 2026-09-02.

147 further markets (1 primary, 50 secondary, 96 tertiary) have no readings loaded yet and are not listed. They are not markets that scored badly — nothing has been measured for them.

Rankings are computed from public government data and, where a firm has written one, that firm’s own read of the market. They are an automated indicator, not an appraisal, not investment advice, and not a substitute for underwriting a specific property. Every input and weight is shown so the number can be checked.